There was a different, pleasing feel about last week’s Mackinac Policy Conference.
True, the crowd on the wonderfully long, pale green and white porch of the Grand Hotel, punctuated by blazing red geraniums, was as aggressive as ever around the bars at cocktail time.
But the mood was markedly different than in recent years. “This is the first conference in a decade that didn’t consist of wall-to-wall whining,” one grandee told me as he twirled his gin and tonic.
Even a prominent Democrat remarked: “There’s a lot of momentum this time. You can quibble about some of the details (of Gov. Rick Snyder’s various proposals), but overall, it’s a welcome change from previous years.”
Perhaps the biggest contrast was between Snyder (who was ubiquitous, turning up at all hours and most events) and his predecessor, Jennifer Granholm, governor for the eight sessions past. Both have now addressed big crowds in the Grand’s theater for nearly an hour without using notes. There, any similarity ends.
Granholm, whose sheer speaking and dramatic capability are unmatched in modern Michigan politics, captivated her audiences by the sheer force of her personality and presentation.
But in governing against a backdrop of a “single state depression” that she didn’t cause — and could do relatively little about — she had no choice but to emphasize the rhetorical over the factual.
Snyder, riding on a wave of breathtaking legislative accomplishment, was cool, confident, in control.
John Bebow, the executive director of the Center for Michigan, sat beside me for Snyder’s speech. At the end, he remarked, “His unscripted honesty and directness are just stunning.”
The new governor’s comments centered on our state’s history and culture. We have experienced two great periods of remarkable prosperity over the centuries, he said. The first centered around the exploitation of Michigan’s remarkable natural resources, whether the beaver (whose pelts led to our first multi-millionaire, John Jacob Astor, who used Mackinac Island as the headquarters for his fur business in the 1820s) or the copper and iron ore of the Upper Peninsula and the white pine of the north woods.
Our second great boom was driven by the great entrepreneurs of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the men who created Dow Chemical, Upjohn, Kellogg, Ford and a score of others. “There was no place in America that matched the scale and scope of Michigan’s economic miracle at that time … We were the Silicon Valley” of that era, Snyder explained.
And, he added, there’s no reason Michigan can’t do that again — if we have the guts, imagination and staying power.
Unfortunately, as the auto industry grew and prospered in the 20th century, “we got too successful,” he said. Successful, fat, and lazy. We forgot costs, lost sight of entrepreneurialism and allowed ourselves to be deluded that our prosperity would last for ever. The periodic downturns of the latter part of the 20th century indicated something wasn’t right; the Great Recession of the 21st century nearly did us in.
The bottom line, Snyder argued, is that now is the opportunity for us to build a new Michigan. “We tend to look at the past, in the rearview mirror. We spend too much time thinking about how we keep that good thing going,” Snyder said. “It’s time to look towards the future.”
The big issue, according to the governor, is our culture, that fragile and hard-to-pin-down set of attitudes and habits that define people’s thinking and, thus, doing.
“The biggest change we need to have in Michigan is not in law or regulations or taxes, but in our culture,” he argued. Snyder pointed to the state’s response to what so far has been a shrinking economy:
“There’s this divisive attitude about win-lose,” he said, describing our belief that for somebody to get ahead, somebody else had to fall behind. “It shows up in politics too much. It shows up in East-West too much. Every Michigander loses (from that) – even the people who are winning, because we’re just sinking more.”
He described what this culture looks like from his perspective as governor. He has too many meetings that start off with a request or demand for money. “That’s not the key for a good conversation,” he said wryly. Next, when presented with a new idea, too often he hears the objection that “we’ve always done it this way.”
Snyder’s right. Culture trumps a whole lot of things, whether tax policy or reapportionment or emergency financial management. Trouble is, culture is tougher to change than to define.
But changing it is absolutely at the core of where our state needs to go.
Correction: In his June 2 column, Phil Power asserted that implementing right to work policy in Michigan would require a constitutional amendment. This is not so; it can be done by statute alone. Mr. Power regrets the error.
Editor’s note: Former newspaper publisher and University of Michigan Regent Phil Power is a longtime observer of Michigan politics and economics. He is also the founder and president of The Center for Michigan, a nonprofit, bipartisan centrist think-and-do tank, designed to cure Michigan’s dysfunctional political culture. The opinions expressed here are Power’s own and do not represent the official views of The Center. He welcomes your comments at ppower@thecenterformichigan.net


6 Comments
You hit upon this Governor’s strength – namely reminding Michigan that we are not a bunch of losers, but instead one of this nation’s – historically – most successful and forward thinking states. If he actually implements policies that foster entrepreneurial activity and backs that up with government investment in the state rather than hiding behind lofty rhetoric while divesting in our infrastructure and looking for short term solutions to enrich his political benefactors then he might actually help Michigan reclaim its greatness.
So far I remain skeptical of whether Snyder can actually push a moderate agenda through the legislature filled with tea party types. So far I don’t think he has challenged the Libertarian/Republican majorities to move outside of their comfort zone on policy. The bridge to Canada is a litmus test for his leadership abilities.
Worth noting that the state’s unemployment rate has come down 25 percent in the last year, even with the “job killing” Michigan Business Tax in place. As noted by the Free Press: “After two years of shrinking, the state’s economy grew 2.9% last year, faster than the national average of 2.6%, according to the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. That’s a dramatic turnaround from declines of 4.3% in 2008 and 5% in 2009. Last year, Michigan was the 15th fastest growing state in the country, a huge leap from its 48th spot in 2009.”
Perhaps this change — unrelated to any elections or speeches by public officials — was at least a small factor in the more positive view from Mackinac.
Governor Granholm … “could do relatively little about “. What if in 2003 Governor Snyder had been elected instead of Granholm? Would Michigan have come out of the recession 8 years earlier? It does make a difference who we elect governor, what party, liberal or conservative. Granholm did not have a business or CPA background. I think of Granhom as the recession governor, maintaining the recession, incapable of ending the recession.
“But in governing against a backdrop of a “single state depression” that she didn’t cause — and could do relatively little about — she had no choice but to emphasize the rhetorical over the factual.”
Was this article written while the author was imbibing a large quantity of gin and tonic himself?
Exactly what did Gov. Granholm do to fix Michigan’s economy while she was at the helm?
The MBT?
Higher income taxes?
More government regulations?
Pursuing “Green Jobs” (an oxymoron if there ever was one), in which the government has to provide massive incentives for consumers to purchase their product.
I also would be popping any champagne corks just quite yet because the Free Press says the economy is getting better.
The Fed doesn’t share their rosy prognostications.
And then there’s that issue with the US debt that isn’t being addressed.
Does anyone really think that won’t tip Michigan’s economy down into that second dip?
Using the examples the Gov Snyder use look to those companies and see if all have suffered like the Detroit 3 or if they have prospered and how do their cultures differ. maybe there is a lesson there.
If Gov. Snyder wants to change culture, if he simply left a meeting the moment soneone asked for money the culture would quickly change and people would want to know what they had to do to keep him their. If he wanted to have the issue exapanded and ideas to address it as the topic than as long as that is what he got he would, things would changed. Changing culture starts by deciding what is important and focusing on it, not by whining about it.
Is this really a new beginning? Sure feels like it really might be. Let’s talk again in two years. Then we’ll really know if it’s real. In the meantime, we marvel at how a state budget can get done so quickly. We make a sigh of relief that perhaps the gridlock-laden bickering is turning to more civility at last. And we watch as signs begin to gather, one light at a time, and we hope for a constellation.